Community

Review Guidelines

A short field guide to writing reviews that help other readers — and pass moderation on the first try.

Last updated · 2026-05-17

§ 01

Why we have guidelines

Reviews on Multi-Faucet are read by people deciding whether to spend their time on a faucet. A clear, specific review can save someone an hour and a wasted captcha streak. A vague or dishonest one wastes everyone’s.

These guidelines describe what makes a review useful, what isn’t allowed, and what happens to reviews that don’t meet the bar.

Short version: write from your own experience, include a date and amount when you can, skip the marketing talk.
§ 02

What makes a good review

The reviews that help readers most usually:

  • describe a real experience — claims you made, withdrawals you requested, support tickets you opened;
  • include an approximate date of your last withdrawal;
  • mention the amount and the withdrawal method (FaucetPay, direct wallet, and so on);
  • note the captcha type and how aggressive the ads or redirects feel;
  • balance pros and cons — a faucet rarely deserves a pure 1 or 5;
  • stay readable: a few short paragraphs beat a wall of text.

A short, honest review with a single payout proof is worth more than ten generic five-star raves.

§ 03

How to use the star rating

The star rating sits next to your text and should roughly match what you wrote. As a rough guide:

  • 5 stars — consistent payouts, fair UX, low ads. You’d recommend it to a friend.
  • 4 stars — solid faucet with small downsides (slower withdrawals, captcha grind, occasional issues).
  • 3 stars — mixed experience. Some good, some bad. Worth using if you’re patient.
  • 2 stars — repeated problems: long delays, aggressive ads, account issues.
  • 1 star — non-payment, broken withdrawals, scam-like behaviour. Use the scam report form for serious cases.

If you give a 1-star or 5-star rating, your text should explain why. Extreme ratings without context are usually held back during review.

§ 04

Payout proof

Payout proofs are optional but powerful. A screenshot of a withdrawal page, a wallet receipt or a transaction explorer link makes your review much more credible — and contributes to the faucet’s trust score.

  • upload a clear screenshot or paste a public transaction link;
  • redact wallet addresses, personal IDs and anything sensitive;
  • only submit proofs that belong to you and that you have the right to share.
Fabricated or recycled payout proofs are treated as fake reviews. Accounts that submit them can be suspended.
§ 05

What isn’t allowed

The following content is removed during moderation:

  • Referral spam — links to your own referral, sign-up codes hidden in the text, “DM me to join”;
  • Fake or recycled proof — screenshots from other sites, photoshopped balances, stock images;
  • Guaranteed-income claims — “earn $X per day”, “1 BTC weekly”, anything that promises a return;
  • Malware or phishing — shortened links, scripts, payloads;
  • Adult content and gambling-spam links;
  • Harassment — personal attacks on operators, other reviewers or moderators;
  • Personal data — emails, wallet addresses, phone numbers belonging to other people;
  • Off-topic material — reviews of unrelated services, news rants, copy-pasted articles;
  • Bot or scripted submissions, mass reviews, identical text across multiple faucets;
  • Illegal content under applicable law.
§ 06

One review per faucet

Each account can publish one active review per faucet. If your experience changes — better, worse, fixed — you can edit the existing review rather than posting a new one. Edits go back through moderation, and the updated review shows the new timestamp.

Multiple accounts used to amplify a single voice (positive or negative) count as review manipulation and can result in all affected reviews being removed.

§ 07

Conflicts of interest

If you own, work for or have a paid relationship with a faucet, please disclose that in your review or avoid rating that listing entirely. Reviews written by faucet owners about their own faucets are removed when we can identify them.

The same rule applies in reverse: don’t use the review system to harm a competitor’s listing with reviews you wouldn’t write as a real user.

§ 08

How moderation works

Every review is queued for review before it appears publicly. Moderators check it against these guidelines and either approve it, edit it for minor issues or reject it.

A review may be rejected if it:

  • breaks the rules above;
  • contains no useful information beyond a star rating;
  • looks copy-pasted from another site;
  • can’t be reconciled with the evidence you provided.

Most decisions arrive within a couple of days. You can track your review status — pending, approved, rejected, edited — from your dashboard.

§ 09

Flagging someone else’s review

If you read a review that looks dishonest, spammy or abusive, use the flag option on the review card. A short note describing the problem is enough — a moderator will revisit the review with that context.

Flags are not votes. A review isn’t removed just because it has been flagged; the moderator still checks it against these guidelines.

§ 10

What happens if rules are broken

Depending on the severity, a review that breaks the rules may be:

  • edited (for example, a referral link removed) and then approved;
  • rejected with a short note explaining why;
  • removed after publication if a problem is discovered later.

Repeat or serious violations — fake proofs, paid placements, organised manipulation — can result in account suspension and removal of all reviews from that account.

§ 12

Contact us

Questions about a review decision, a flag you filed or these guidelines? Reach out through the contact page or send an email to [email protected].